{"id":376,"date":"2019-02-19T22:14:25","date_gmt":"2019-02-19T19:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/?p=376"},"modified":"2019-02-19T22:19:13","modified_gmt":"2019-02-19T19:19:13","slug":"nafaka-arttirimi-davalari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/2019\/02\/19\/nafaka-arttirimi-davalari\/","title":{"rendered":"Nafaka Artt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 Davalar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sevgili okuyucular\u0131m,<\/p>\n

Bo\u015fanma konusunun \u00e7ocuklarla ilgili verilen sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan olan i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, k\u0131saca \u00e7ocu\u011fun e\u011fitim ve di\u011fer ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan maddi desteklerdendir. Kanunlar\u0131m\u0131za g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yeti\u015fmesi i\u00e7in gerekli olan bu destek 2 tarafl\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 gibi tek bir taraf\u0131n \u00f6demesi \u015feklinde de olabilir. Bu durumda nafaka miktar\u0131 neye g\u00f6re belirlenir diye sorarsan\u0131z:<\/p>\n

Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucuna g\u00f6re belirlenen nafaka miktar\u0131, e\u011fer anla\u015fmal\u0131 bir bo\u015fanma varsa taraflar\u0131n uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcp kabul ettikleri miktar kadar olur. Artt\u0131rma miktar\u0131 da, yine bo\u015fanman\u0131n anla\u015fmal\u0131 olmas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi nafakay\u0131 verecek ki\u015finin belirtti\u011fi oran d\u00e2hilinde olabilir. Ancak \u00e7eki\u015fmeli bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda ba\u011flanan nafaka, hakimin karar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir. Burada herhangi bir anla\u015fma olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in belirlenen nafakada ya da art\u0131\u015f miktar\u0131nda hakim karar\u0131 ile enflasyon oranlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Nafaka miktar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesinde en \u00f6nemli etken ise, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya da \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ayl\u0131k masraflar\u0131n\u0131n toplam\u0131d\u0131r. Di\u011fer \u00f6nemli etken de nafakay\u0131 verecek olan taraf\u0131n gelir d\u00fczeyidir. Enflasyon oranlar\u0131 ki\u015finin gelir d\u00fczeyine uygun de\u011filse, hakimin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc miktar\u0131n daha alt\u0131nda bir miktar da \u00f6nerebilir.<\/p>\n

Nafaka art\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda karara ba\u011flanabilece\u011fi gibi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun masraflar\u0131n\u0131n artmas\u0131 durumunda velayetin kendisinde bulundu\u011fu taraf bu masraflar\u0131 beyan eden belgelerle nafaka art\u0131r\u0131m davas\u0131n\u0131 sonradan da a\u00e7abilir. E\u011fer kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n maddi durumu uygun ise karar olumlu olacakt\u0131r. Ancak istenilen miktar kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n b\u00fct\u00e7esine uymuyorsa o halde devreye \u00fclkede ge\u00e7erli olan enflasyon oranlar\u0131<\/strong> girmektedir.<\/p>\n

Nafaka artt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 davalar\u0131 ile ilgili olarak Yarg\u0131tay 3 Hukuk Dairesinin E. 2016\/4481 2016\/8685 K. nolu karar\u0131n\u0131 sizlerle payla\u015f\u0131yorum.\u00a0 Bu karara g\u00f6re, bu tarz davalarda \u015fu gerek\u00e7elerle ilk derece mahkemesinin menfi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozuldu\u011funu anlayacaks\u0131n\u0131z;<\/p>\n

NAFAKA ARTIRIM DAVASI A\u00c7ILMASININ BELL\u0130 B\u0130R ZAMAN GE\u00c7MES\u0130NE BA\u011eLI TUTULMAMASI ( Taraflar\u0131n Sosyal ve Ekonomik Durumlar\u0131 De\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi Gibi \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 ve \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n da Artt\u0131\u011f\u0131 – M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 E\u011fitim Durumu \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131 Davac\u0131 Anne \u0130le Nafaka Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc Baban\u0131n Ekonomik Durumu G\u00f6zetilerek Hakkaniyet \u0130lkesi de Dikkate Al\u0131narak Uygun Bir Art\u0131\u015f Miktar\u0131na H\u00fckmedilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASININ ARTIRILMASI TALEB\u0130 ( \u00d6nceki Dava Tarihi \u0130le Bu Davan\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tarih Aras\u0131nda 1,5 Y\u0131ldan Fazla S\u00fcre Ge\u00e7ti\u011fi – Taraflar\u0131n Sosyal ve Ekonomik Durumlar\u0131 De\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi Gibi \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 ve \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n da Artt\u0131\u011f\u0131\/M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 E\u011fitim Durumu \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131 Davac\u0131 Anne \u0130le Nafaka Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc Baban\u0131n Ekonomik Durumu G\u00f6zetilerek Hakkaniyet \u0130lkesi de Dikkate Al\u0131narak Uygun Bir Art\u0131\u015f Miktar\u0131na H\u00fckmedilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n

HAKKAN\u0130YET \u0130LKES\u0130 ( Nafakan\u0131n Art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 Talebi – Taraflar\u0131n Sosyal ve Ekonomik Durumlar\u0131 De\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi Gibi \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 ve \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n da Artt\u0131\u011f\u0131\/M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00c7ocu\u011fun Ya\u015f\u0131 E\u011fitim Durumu \u0130htiya\u00e7lar\u0131 Davac\u0131 Anne \u0130le Nafaka Y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc Baban\u0131n Ekonomik Durumu G\u00f6zetilerek Hakkaniyet \u0130lkesi de Dikkate Al\u0131narak Uygun Bir Art\u0131\u015f Miktar\u0131na H\u00fckmedilece\u011fi )<\/p>\n

DAVA \u00d6ZET\u0130 :<\/strong>\u00a0Dava, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Nafaka art\u0131r\u0131m davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 belli bir zaman ge\u00e7mesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, her dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. \u00d6nceki dava tarihi ile bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih aras\u0131nda 1,5 y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde taraflar\u0131n sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi gibi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 ve ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 da do\u011fal olarak artm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, e\u011fitim durumu, ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131, davac\u0131 anne ile nafaka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc baban\u0131n ekonomik durumu g\u00f6zetilerek, hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak uygun bir art\u0131\u015f miktar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmelidir.<\/p>\n

DAVA :\u00a0<\/b>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR :\u00a0<\/b>Davac\u0131 dilek\u00e7esinde; m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun 11.s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisi oldu\u011funu, masraflar\u0131n\u0131n artt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mevcut nafaka miktar\u0131n\u0131n ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek; Aile Mahkemesi’nin 2014\/58 esas 2014\/227 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla her y\u0131l \u00dcfe oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015f yap\u0131larak h\u00fckmedilen 275,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n 400,00 TL’ye art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve y\u0131ll\u0131k … oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015f uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nceki art\u0131r\u0131m ilam\u0131nda nafakan\u0131n her y\u0131l 12 ayl\u0131k \u00dcFE art\u0131\u015f oran\u0131nda art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece; \u00f6nceki nafaka ilam\u0131nda enflasyon oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015fa karar verildi\u011fi ve taraflar\u0131n sosyal ekonomik durumlar\u0131nda ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Dava; i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 182\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince; velayet kendisine tevdi edilmeyen taraf ekonomik imkanlar\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcnde m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011funun giderlerine kat\u0131lmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

\u0130\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 takdir edilirken; \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131, okul seviyesi, sosyal \u00e7evreye g\u00f6re ya\u015fam seviyesi, velayet tevdi edilen taraf\u0131n ekonomik durumu ile nafaka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn mali g\u00fcc\u00fc birlikte de\u011ferlendirilip, hakkaniyete uygun bir nafakaya karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011finden; velayet hakk\u0131 annede olan m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk 1998 do\u011fumlu ve beyana g\u00f6re 11. s\u0131n\u0131f \u00f6\u011frencisi oldu\u011fu; daval\u0131n\u0131n ise, emekli olup, 1.050,00 TL gelirinin ve 1998 model otomobilinin bulundu\u011fu, yeni e\u015fine ait evde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Nafaka art\u0131r\u0131m davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 belli bir zaman ge\u00e7mesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, her dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. \u00d6nceki dava tarihi ile bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih aras\u0131nda 1,5 y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde taraflar\u0131n sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fi gibi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 ve ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 da do\u011fal olarak artm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyo-ekonomik durumlar\u0131, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, e\u011fitim durumu ve ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde; i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131nda art\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi uygun bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

O halde, mahkemece yap\u0131lacak i\u015f; m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131, e\u011fitim durumu, ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131, davac\u0131 anne ile nafaka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcs\u00fc baban\u0131n ekonomik durumu g\u00f6zetilerek, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 4.maddesinde vurgulanan hakkaniyet ilkesi de dikkate al\u0131narak uygun bir art\u0131\u015f miktar\u0131na h\u00fckmetmek olmal\u0131d\u0131r. Eksik de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde davan\u0131n reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7 olarak da,\u00a0temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu sebeplerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan kabul\u00fcyle h\u00fckm\u00fcn HUMK.nun 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istenmesi halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 01.06.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

Konuyla ilgili sorular\u0131n\u0131z bekliyorum, bana a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki email adresimden ula\u015fabilirsiniz…<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sevgiler,<\/p>\n

Avukat \/ Arabulucu Gizem Tan<\/p>\n

gizem.tan@dgtanhukuk.com<\/p>\n

www.dgtanhukuk.com<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sevgili okuyucular\u0131m, Bo\u015fanma konusunun \u00e7ocuklarla ilgili verilen sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan olan i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, k\u0131saca \u00e7ocu\u011fun e\u011fitim ve di\u011fer ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermesi i\u00e7in yap\u0131lan maddi desteklerdendir. Kanunlar\u0131m\u0131za g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yeti\u015fmesi i\u00e7in gerekli olan bu destek 2 tarafl\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131 gibi tek bir taraf\u0131n \u00f6demesi \u015feklinde de olabilir. Bu durumda nafaka miktar\u0131 neye g\u00f6re belirlenir diye sorarsan\u0131z: Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n sonucuna g\u00f6re […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-makaleler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":379,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions\/379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dgtanhukuk.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}